Q)-Write an essay on the rise and development of the ‘Stream of Consciousness’ novel in English with special reference to James Joyce and Virginia Woolf.
ANS:-
Stream of consciousness:
INTRODUCTION
The term stream of consciousness, also known as Interior
monologue characterizes the unbroken flow of thoughts and awareness in the
waking mind. It is a mode of narration that attempts to give the written
equivalent of the character’s thought process either in a loose interior
monologues or in connection to his/her actions. Stream of consciousness as a
narrative technique successfully captures without the author’s intervention
,the complete mental process of the character in which sense perception mingles
with consciousness and half conscious thoughts,memories,feelings and random
associations. In literature, the phrase refers to the flow of these thoughts,
with reference to a particular character’s thinking process. This literary
device is usually used in order to provide a narrative in the form of the
character’s thoughts instead of using dialogue or description. The thought
process in the mind of the characters is never coherent and jumps from one
thought to the another. The world wars had changed how people saw the world and
as a result literature too changed as it is fundamentally the human experience.
There was this post traumatic stress disorder after world war I. Men came from
the war disillusioned with what they saw, did and experienced. The technique of
stream of consciousness best captures these experiences of people. Perhaps the
earliest stream of consciousness writer was the minor French novelist and a
short story writer Eduard Dujardin who attempted the technique in a rather
crude manner in his short novel “The laurels have been cut” In English the
technique has been used by Dorothy Richardson in pilgrimage (1915-1938)
Virginia Woolf in Mrs. Dalloway (1925) To the light house (1927) William
Faulkner in first part of The sound and fury(1929) arguably because of the long
passages found in them by George meridith,Henry James and James Joyce in
Ulysses (1922).
Characteristics of Stream of
Consciousness:
Records multifarious thoughts and feelings: stream of
consciousness writing is known to record the multiple thoughts that keep
occurring in the minds of the individual. It attempts to give the written
equivalent of the characters thought process either in a loose interior
monologue or in connection to his or her action. In This technique the speakers
thoughts are more often depicted as overheard in the mind.the authors of this
technique follow visual,auditory, factile,associative impressions and express
them using interior monologue of characters.this narrative mode mingles
thoughts and impressions in an illogical order and violates grammatical
norms.It is a style of writing developed by a group of writers at the beginning
of the 20th century. It aimed at expressing in words the flow of a character’s
thoughts and feelings in their minds. The technique aspires to give readers the
impression of being inside the mind of the character. Therefore, the internal
view of the minds of the characters sheds light on plot and motivation in the
novel. When used as a term in literature, stream of consciousness is a
narrative form in which the author writes in a way that mimics or parallels a
character’s internal thoughts. Sometimes this device is also called “internal
monologue,” and often the style incorporates the natural chaos of thoughts and
feelings that occur in any of our minds at any given time. Just as happens in
real life, stream-of-consciousness narratives often lack associative leaps and
are characterized by an absence of regular punctuation.
Stream of consciousness writings and
prominent writers:
Though this study is confined to the two prominent writers
such as James Joyce and Virginia Woolf, there are other notable writers who
deserve to be mentioned. The other writers who have successfully used this
technique are Allen Ginsberg, Marcel Proust, Dorothy Richardson, welsh Irvine,
William Faulkner and Wilson Robert Anton.
James Joyce and Virginia Woolf:
The
writers for this study: The novels for this study: this study aims to
study the stream of consciousness style of writing in literature with respect
to the two of Joyce’ novels : ‘Ulysses’ and the ‘portrait of artist as a young
man’ and two of Woolf’s novels namely’ Mrs. Dalloway ‘and’ To the light house’
James Joyce (1882-1941), and stream of consciousness: A writer from Ireland
wrote his masterpiece “Ulysses” which serves as a landmark in the modernist
literature. He is the earliest and the best known practitioners of stream of
consciousness. This study would focus on two of Joyce’s novels which epitomize
his signature stream of consciousness prose style, Portrait of artist as a
young man’ which is also an autobiographical novel and ‘Ulysses’. For Joyce,
his fiction is marked by moments of intense realization when his characters
suddenly discover truths about themselves and are given moments of intense
insight. For example, in "Araby," the teenage protagonist, having
developed and nurtured his love for the shapless Mangan's sister, is suddenly
forced to realise the shallowness of his love and how stupid he has been. long
and hazardous period of probation seems to face a writer when, ceasing to be a
contemporary, he becomes a classic. But in the case of James Joyce, perhaps
because he was so rigorously tested during his lifetime, this further trial has
been cut short. Already his work has weathered rejection by publishers,
objection by printers, suppression by censors, confiscation by custom
officials, bowdlerization by pirates, oversight by proofreaders, attack by
critics, and defense by coteries--not to mention misunderstanding by readers.
Meanwhile he has won the most significant kind of recognition: imitation by
writers. His influence has been so pervasive that, to a large extent, it
remains unacknowledged. How many of those who read John Hersey's Hiroshima
recognize its literary obligation to Ulysses. There have been other
demonstrations, but none so pertinent, of how an original mode of expression
can help us to grasp a new phase of experience. Is it any wonder, when we live
in such an explosive epoch, that even the arts have made themselves felt through
a series of shocks. Hence Joyce's books, which a few years ago we had to
smuggle into this country, are today required reading in college courses. As we
study them closely, we are less intimidated by their idiosyncrasies, and more
impressed not only by the qualities they share with the great books of other
ages, but by their vital concern for the problems of our own age. In the light
of the political exile that has activated so many writers in recent years,
Joyce's artistic expatriation no longer seems a willful gesture. His escape
from his native island to the continent of Europe, as it turned out, was to
merge his private career with what he called the nightmare of history. It was
easier for Flaubert, a sedentary bachelor with a comfortable estate and a
regular income, to assume the stigmata of aesthetic martyrdom. It was
excruciating for Joyce, a nomadic foreigner struggling to support a family by
other means than his writing, to be bound--as he put it--"to the cross of
his own cruel fiction." The temptations and distractions that sidetrack
the artist have multiplied, and examples of intransigence are rarer now than
they were in Flaubert's day. What he represented to his younger contemporaries,
nonetheless, Joyce has become for us: the Writers' Writer. The characteristics
that enabled him to sustain his purpose are apparent in his very death-mask.
Delicately but firmly molded, the head is long and narrow, the forehead high,
the chin strong, and the eyes closed. It is the face of his Stephen Dedalus, of
the perennial student, of a man who carries to the verge of his sixtieth year
the agility, the curiosity, the sensibility of his youth. And, just as many of
Joyce's fellow citizens are forever transfixed in the poses he caught--the
priests saying Mass, the barmaids pouring ale, the sandwich-men filing by, the
midwives and undertakers plying their respective trades--so he has crystallized
himself in our minds as the hero of Stephen Hero, the model for A Portrait of
the Artist as a Young Man. Setting down his memories of his brother in a
current Italian journal, Professor Stanislaus Joyce would caution us against a
too complete identification. James Joyce was a rather more filial son than
Stephen Dedalus, it appears, and his actual adolescence was less dispiriting
than his later depiction of it. This we might have gathered by comparing the
account of his university days in Stephen Hero with the final chapter of the
Portrait. The earlier version is more immediate, fully rounded and factually
detailed; the definitive treatment is carefully shaded and dramatically
sharpened. It is not enough for the novelist to possess, like a number of
Joyce's characters, "an odd autobiographical habit." He must be able
to trace a meaningful pattern through the welter of circumstances. Joyce has
managed, by invoking an ancient myth, to conjure up a modern one. Deliberately
he has struck the attitude of Icarus--the classical posture of flight, the
artist's revulsion from his middle-class environment, the youthful effort to
try one's father's wings. The works of Joyce's maturity are less personal and
more human: in his own terms, they are farther removed from his lyric self and
closer to his godlike ideal of sympathetic detachment. Their emphasis shifts
from flight to creation, accordingly, and from the son's role to the
fatherimage: Dedalus, the fabulous artificer; Ulysses, the paternal wanderer;
Finnegan, the builder of cities. The technical and psychological paradox is
that Joyce, as his comprehension of ordinary humanity increased, became less
comprehensible to the common reader. He is commonly remembered not as the
mature creator--forging, in mingled arrogance and piety, "the uncreated
conscience of his race"--but as a winged figure poised for a break with
the dominating forces in his background. Language, religion, and nationality
were envisaged by Stephen as a series of nets to restrain that initial impetus.
When his trial flight succeeded, and the creative process began, the metaphor
was calculated to change. For the irreducible substances out of which Joyce
created his monumental achievement were nationality, religion, and language.
The first consideration, with an Irishman, is nationality. Joyce, like Stephen,
was "all too Irish"-- all the more Irish because he was a "wild
goose," because he resided mainly in foreign countries after his twentieth
year, seldom as long as a year in the same domicile. From first to last, his
underlying impulses were those of his racial endowment: humor, imagination,
eloquence, belligerence. If other endemic traits are less in evidence, notably
gregariousness and bibulousness, it is because they were so brilliantly
exemplified in Joyce's father. A genial ne'erdo-well, a political job-holder, a
man about Dublin--but there can be no substitute for the characterization of
Simon Dedalus by his eldest son. The Portrait begins with the child's earliest
reminiscence, a story told by his parent; it ends with the fledgling's
departure from his parental roof. Its most dramatic episode occurs at the
family's Christmas dinner. Here, in a vividly remembered argument, lies Joyce's
basic premise: the long-delayed hope of independence that was frustrated again
with the downfall of Ireland's leading politician, Charles Stewart Parnell.
JAMES JOYCE'S Ulysses was first published by a young American bookseller in
Paris nearly fifty years ago--the rest is literary history. No novel written in
this century has laid such a large claim on the literature and criticism of our
time. Ulysses stands as one of the seminal works of our culture, and to say
this is not in any sense to make personal claims for it. The enormous amount of
critical material that has been written on Ulysses is legend and not the
subject for discussion here, except to note the fact that all the previous book-
length studies of Ulysses have been written by individual authors, each
pursuing a special line of inquiry, each developing his own approach through a
sustained reading of the book. The quality of these contributions to Ulysses
criticism, of course, varies, and the time of composition affects the
perspective of each author. In the 1930s, for example, Stuart Gilbert and Frank
Budgen books on Ulysses were written with firsthand information from Joyce
himself. The nearly dozen book- length studies which have followed represent a
wide range in both quality and approach. This volume is the first book-length
study to pre,
Virginia Woolf :( 1882- 1941)
Virginia Woolf was interested in giving voice to the complex
inner world of feeling and memory and conceived the human personality as a
continuous shift of impressions and emotions. that traditionally made up a
story were no longer important for her; what mattered was the impression they
made on the characters who experienced them. In her novels the omniscient narrator
disappeared and the point of view shifted inside the characters’ minds through
flashbacks, associations of ideas, momentarily impressions presented as a
continuous flux. To the lighthouse : a key example of stream of consciousness
technique. This novel includes very little diaologue and almost no action
,written as thoughts and observations to the lighthouse, recalls childhood
memories and emotions and highlights adult relations . among book’s many tropes
and themes are those of loss, subjectivity and the problem of perception. The
world of reading woolf is a world of psyche and abstractions the bringing to
the forefront of our unconsciousness thoughts and emotions the ones we all have
that affect us heavily ,that we are woefully aware of time gets slowed down and
the magic of the moment is reached .Life is about perception and nobody seems
to get this better than Woolf.
In one of her essays Woolf quotes "Life is not a series
of gig lamps symmetrically arranged; life is a luminous halo, a semi-transparent
envelope surrounding us from the beginning of consciousness to the end."
Virginia Woolf’s critical writings are witty, entertaining, deliciously
sarcastic, and yet written in the spirit of an artistic mentor and a reader who
questions herself as much as she questions others. Her novels are as complex
and conflicted as her relationship with the business of reviewing. She dreaded
each morning spent reviewing, procrastinated, cursed the whole business, and
was at the same time deeply concerned about the reception of her work
,blossomed with praise, and in the end could simply not resist the pull of
criticism. Her philosophy could not be summarized on a small exam cheat sheet.
Parts seem paradoxical: she demanded verdicts and condemned verdicts. She
delighted in unified, consistent, beautiful art and thought at the same time
that all these worries over aesthetic and formal aspects must be suspended
until the modern novelist dares to travel the perilous psyche of the modern
mind .However, in all these paradoxes, she consistently defied the labelling
practices she resented .Studying the body of her critical work, which makes up
six volumes combined, is a serious challenge after so many voices have stamped
upon it half-baked opinions, careful denigrations, and various labels. Only
recently has the study of Woolf’s essays become more than a corollary to the
study of her novels. the close analysis will focus on the reviews and longer
essays. The mostly paragraph-long notices of “lesser books” are too short to
offer any opportunity for indepth readings and are not what held her interest
in journalism. Virginia woolf is considered one of the prominent writers who is
Recognized as the most important feminist writer (and perhaps one of the most
important writers in general) of all time, used the stream-of-consciousness
technique to great significance in her works. She is a writer who is known for
her finest treatment of problems of love and loneliness. Her novels Mrs
Dalloway and To the lighthouse will be dealt with in this study. For Woolf, on
the other hand, her fiction features "moments of importance," which
she defined as follows: Examine for a moment an ordinary mind on ordinary day.
The mind receives myriad impressions-trivial, fantastic, evanescent, or engraved
with the sharpness of steel. From all sides they came, an incessant shower of
innumerable atoms; and as they fall, as they shape themselves into the life. To
make it more explicit we have an extract from her novel ‘Mrs Dalloway’:
"Such fools we all are, she thought, crossing Victoria Street. For Heaven
only knows why one loves afresh; but the veriest frumps, the most dejected of
miseries sitting on doorsteps (drink their downfall) do the same; can't be
dealt with, she felt positive, by Acts of Parliament for that very reason: they
love life. In people's eyes, in the swing, tramp, trudge; in the bellow and the
uproar; the carriages, motor cars, omnibuses, vans, sandwich men shuffling and
swinging; brass bands; barrel organs; in the triumph and the jingle and the strange
high singing of some aeroplane overhead was what she loved; life; London; this
moment of June." .The importance of stream of consciousness technique in
modern literature: The role of stream of consciousness in literature is
typically as a character study. It is a purposeful innovation in the modern
prose style .The modernist writers such as Woolf and her contemporaries wanted
their work to reflect life in its complete authenticity mirroring the universal
human experience. Hence this study would try to locate how far these novelists
have succeeded in achieving it. The character is not speaking to the audience
in this literary device, as he or she is in a monologue, but is rather speaking
to himself. Though the character may be analyzing events that happened in the
story, and moving the plot along in that way, typically the character is
examining his or her response to the events. Usually, this is a literary
technique that the author will dip into and out of throughout the story, though
some writers will produce an entire novel in this stream of consciousness
format, with the character acting as the narrator.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please do not enter any Link in the comment box.